Timeline extended for launch of Wilson Library facilities work.

Collection Number: 05689

Collection Title: William H. Williams Collection of Criminal Court Papers, 1968-1992

This is a finding aid. It is a description of archival material held in the Wilson Library at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Unless otherwise noted, the materials described below are physically available in our reading room, and not digitally available through the World Wide Web. See the Duplication Policy section for more information.


expand/collapse Expand/collapse Collection Overview

Size 1.0 feet of linear shelf space (approximately 170 items)
Abstract The collection of William H. Williams, judge in the Criminal Court in Shelby County, Tenn., and the Criminal Appeals Court, is comprised chiefly of legal documents pertaining to the cases of James Earl Ray, assassin of Martin Luther King, Jr., and serial murderer George Howard Putt of Memphis, Tenn. Legal documents include petitions, motions, briefs, affidavits, orders, opinions, and memorandum of findings. Other materials include handwritten notes Williams made on the cases, slight correspondence with other officers of the court, and a thank you letter following Judge Williams denial of a new trial for Ray.
Creator Williams, William H., 1926-2003.
Curatorial Unit University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Library. Southern Historical Collection.
Language English
Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Information For Users

Restrictions to Access
No restrictions. Open for research.
Restrictions to Use
No usage restrictions.
Copyright Notice
Copyright is retained by the authors of items in these papers, or their descendants, as stipulated by United States copyright law.
Preferred Citation
[Identification of item], in the William H. Williams Collection of Criminal Court Papers #5689, Southern Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Acquisitions Information
Received from John Trent Williams in April 2016 (Acc, 102573).
Sensitive Materials Statement
Manuscript collections and archival records may contain materials with sensitive or confidential information that is protected under federal or state right to privacy laws and regulations, the North Carolina Public Records Act (N.C.G.S. § 132 1 et seq.), and Article 7 of the North Carolina State Personnel Act (Privacy of State Employee Personnel Records, N.C.G.S. § 126-22 et seq.). Researchers are advised that the disclosure of certain information pertaining to identifiable living individuals represented in this collection without the consent of those individuals may have legal ramifications (e.g., a cause of action under common law for invasion of privacy may arise if facts concerning an individual's private life are published that would be deemed highly offensive to a reasonable person) for which the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill assumes no responsibility.
Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Processing Information

Processed by: Laura Hart, May 2016

Encoded by: Laura Hart, May 2016

Updated by: Nancy Kaiser, January 2021

Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Subject Headings

The following terms from Library of Congress Subject Headings suggest topics, persons, geography, etc. interspersed through the entire collection; the terms do not usually represent discrete and easily identifiable portions of the collection--such as folders or items.

Clicking on a subject heading below will take you into the University Library's online catalog.

Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Biographical Information

William Hargreaves Williams (1926-2003) was a prosecutor and later criminal court judge in Memphis, Tenn. As a judge, Williams presided over highly publicized trials, including the appeals of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassin James Earl Ray and the conviction of serial murderer George Howard Putt.

Born in Deland, Fla., to Wray Williams and Persis Buck Williams, William H. Williams grew up in Memphis, Tenn., where his mother was a civic leader and an associate of Memphis political boss Edward Hull Crump, for whom she got out the women's vote.

Williams served in the United States Naval Air Corps at the end of World War II and then attended Louisiana State University where he played football for one year. He received his bachelor’s degree from Memphis State University (MSU) in 1949 and worked at the Wray Williams Blueprint Company from 1947 to 1957. He graduated from MSU law school in 1955.

From 1959 to 1962, Williams was an assistant district attorney in Memphis, and after two years in private practice, he served as a county attorney in Tennessee from 1964 to 1969. In 1969, Williams was appointed judge to the Criminal Court in Memphis. He served as judge for 22 years and an additional eight years as a senior judge appointed by the Tennessee State Supreme Court. He retired in 1998.

Williams was married to Betty Williams, and they had four children, John Trent Williams, David Williams, Bobby Williams, and Ginny Williams Wilcox.

Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Scope and Content

The collection of William H. Williams, judge in the Criminal Court in Shelby County, Tenn., and the Criminal Appeals Court, is comprised chiefly of legal documents pertaining to the cases of James Earl Ray, assassin of Martin Luther King, Jr., and serial murderer George Howard Putt of Memphis, Tenn. Legal documents include petitions, motions, briefs, affidavits, orders, opinions, and memorandum of findings. Other materials include handwritten notes Williams made on the cases, slight correspondence with other officers of the court, and a thank you letter following Judge Williams denial of a new trial for Ray.

The bulk of the collection pertains to multiple petitions for post-conviction relief made on behalf of James Earl Ray, who in 1969 was convicted with a plea of guilty and sentenced to ninety-nine years in prison for the first degree murder of civil rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., on 4 April 1968. Ray's claims for relief included denial of due process, coerced plea of guilty, ineffective counnsel, trial judge error, and cruel and unusual punishment associated with solitary confinement. Most court documents are copies, and some have handwritten annotations made by Williams. Ray remained in prison until his death in 1998.

Materials related to the murder convictions and petitions for post-conviction relief of George Howard Putt are also chiefly copies of court documents with some handwritten items by Williams. Putt was convicted and initially sentenced to die by electrocution for one of the five murders he committed in the summer of 1969 in Shelby County, Tenn. His death sentence was overturned and changed to life in prison. After standing trial for two of the other murders, Putt was given consecutive sentences totaling more than 400 years. He died in prison in March 2016. Several documents concern Putt's sanity hearing in April 1970. Putt's claims for post-conviction relief included ineffective counsel, denial of transfer to a psychiatric hospital, and the state of Tennessee's use of the McNaughten Rule for testing legal sanity.

Back to Top

Contents list

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Series Quick Links

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Series 1. James Earl Ray, 1968-1992and undated.

Approximately 150 items.

Arrangement: chronological.

Folder 1

Affidavit of Jerry Ray, November1968

"I told Mr. Foreman that I had talked to the writer, Mr. Huie, and that he said to me that if my brother, James Earl Ray, took the witness stand it would ruin his book. Mr. Foreman told me then that if my brother went to trial with Mr. Arthur Haynes as his lawyer, he would be electricuted [sic] as Mr. Haynes and Mr. Huie were old friends and that all these men were after was the money." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn.)

Folder 2

State of Tennessee v. James Earl Ray, Alias, 1968-1970

Motion to Produce "1. Any firearm or other weapon…2. Any automobile allegedly owned or operated by defendant…3. Records or documents pertaining to any hotel…4. All photographs…"

Answer to the motion to produce.

Motion for Production of Books, Papers, Documents and Tangible Objects.

Order "directing the Sheriff to cease and desist from the use of television lights, cameras and microphones in security and surveillance of the defendant." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645 Murder)

Folder 3

Guilty Plea Proceedings, 10 March1969

"'We, the Jury find the defendant James Earl Ray guilty of murder in the first degree as charged in the indictment and fix his punishment at confinement for ninety-nine (99) years in the state penitentiary at Nashville, Tennessee.'" (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645 Murder)

Folder 4

Affidavit, 26 March1969

"On or about the 6th day of June 1968 I was arrested at the Heathrow airport, London England, Subsequently I was charged with homicide in the United States and ordered held for immigration hearing. After being held incommunicado for approximately 4 days I was taken before an English magistrate and ordered held for an extradition hearing....After I was returned to Memphis Tenn and confined in the Shelby County Jail, I was denied access to legal counsel, or sleep, until I submitted to palm prints."

Folder 5

Amended and Supplemental Motion for a New Trial, 7 April1969

"James Earl Ray…moves this Honorable Court to set aside his waiver, his plea of guilty, and his conviction and grant him a new trial." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645)

Folder 6

Memorandum Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law, 6 June1969

"A Jury was empaneled, sworn, evidence of witnesses presented, stipulations heard, and a plea of Guilty to Murder in the First Degree was entered in the presence of this Jury." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645)

Folder 7

Deposition of Percy Foreman, 11 November 1969

"From me, I think he received the right to continue living; from Mr. Huie, he received money for investigation, preparation and defense of a case in which his adversaries are reported to have spent $440,000…I have neither contracted nor had any conversation with any person, firm or corporation concerning either motion picture or other rights deriving from James Earl Ray or the murder of Martin Luther King." (United States District Court for the Western Division of Tennessee, No. 60-199 Civil)

Folder 8

Memorandum Denying Petition for Certiorari, 9 January1970

"The defendant has filed a petition for writ of certiorari to this Court and has, in effect, two assignments of error, (1) that certain letters written by him to the late Judge Preston W. Battle constituted a motion for a new trial and (2) that the trial court erred in ruling that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty, thus waiving any right he might have had to an appeal." (Supreme Court of Tennessee)

Folder 9

Petition for Post Conviction Relief, 13 April1970

"Petitioner would show…That he and his prior two attorneys in Cause No. 16645 in the Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, entered into contracts with the author William Bradford Huie while petitioner was in the Shelby County jail awaiting trial, said contracts being primarily to sell the publishing and movie rights concerning the petitioner's case; that this sale was to made to the said William Bradford Huie for substantial sums..." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn. No. H.C. 661)

Folder 10

Affidavit of Carol Pepper and Albert Pepper, 16 April1970

"Mr. Foreman further said that if James Earl would co-operate and keep his mouth shut, he, Mr. Foreman, would get him a pardon in a matter of about two years, as he knew who the next governor would be."

Folder 11

Designation to hear petition, April1970

Includes Williams's acceptance of the designation by Tennessee State Supreme Court.

Folder 12

Memorandum of Findings of Fact and Law, 20 April1970

Also included are Petition for Waiver of Trial and Request for Acceptance of Pleas of Guilty, Order Authorizing Waiver of Trial and Accepting Plea of Guilty, Voir Dire of Defendant on Waiver and Order, copies of Ray's letters to the Court, and Amended and Supplemental Motion for a New Trial. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn. No. H.C. 661)

Folder 13

Memphis Police Department Report on Complaint Call to Bobby Davis, 25 April1970

"He also stated that he knew who killed Martin Luther King and that it was not James Earl Ray. At this point, we asked Mr. Davis why he did not come to the Police Department with any information if he had any concerning this case. He stated you don't think I am crazy do you? At this time, he stated I'm going to produce Shadow Over Memphis which is to be a movie concerning the Howard Putt case come hell or high water."

Folder 14

Amended Petition for Post Conviction Relief, 7 May1970

"Your petitioner charges that his rights of 'due process' guaranteed him by both the State and Federal Constitutions have been grossly violated." Ray's petition claims: "I. Due Process Denied in Proceeding Whereby Petitioner Was Extradited to Memphis...II. Trial by Press...III. Exculpatory Information Withheld from Petitioner...IV. Unavailability of Witnesses...V. Unreasonable Search and Seizure... VI. Right to Counsel...VII. The Deal...VIII. Petitioner Accepted the Deal Under Duress and Bribery...IX. Cruel and Unusual Punishment...He was kept in solitary confinement in Memphis for nine months. He was cut off from all fresh air and daylight during this long period of time...XI. Did Petitioner in Fact Agree in Court that He Was Voluntarily Pleading Guilty?...XII. Fraud on the Court...Despite a prohibition against pre-trial publicity Look Magazinepublished highly prejudicial articles by author Wm. Bradford Huie, who received his information from Attorney Arthur Hanes...XIII. Public Interest...XIV. Trial Judge Intended to Hear Motion for New Trial at Time of His Death...XV. Delay" (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 15

Brief and Argument, 5 June1970

"Petitioner urges upon this Court that making available to him the evidence, both material and intangible, is not the prelude to a 'fishing expedition' but only specifically to aid him in the establishment of his Petition for Post Conviction Relief of certain vital, necessary facts." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 16

Affidavit of James Earl Ray, 7 July1970

"I, James Earl Ray, do solemnly swear that owing to my poverty that I am unable to bear the expense of any Court proceeding or appeal therefrom." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 17

Briefs, 25 August 1970

Submitted by the State of Tennessee: "petitioner claims a coerced plea by reason of the death penalty, again at the instance of privately retained counsel."

Submitted by the State of Tennessee: "Petitioner has raised the question of his extradition from England apparently on the grounds his crime [was] a political one although there are no allegations of facts as a basis for that allegation."

State of Tennessee's response to amended petition: "There is no allegation of fact or conclusion that the guilty plea of the Petitioner was in any way induced by Percy Foreman's conversation with Judge Battle or that the pleas was a result of any promise or coercion of Judge Battle." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 18

Petitioner's Answer to Motion to Strike, 31 August1970

"Allegation that Plea Was Involuntary Has Not Been 'Previously Determined' Thus, A Hearing on the Merits Is Required." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 19

Supplement to Amended Petition for Post Conviction Relief, 22 September1970

"Attorney Percy Foreman Violated Legal Ethics and Petitioner's Legal Rights By Negotiating the Guilty Plea Directly with Trial Judge Preston Battle." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 20

James Earl Ray v. State of Tennessee1970

"Rehearing denied." (Supreme Court of Tennessee)

Folder 21

Motions, 1970-1971

Motion to Declare Indigency of Defendant.

Motion for an Order "to permit psychiatrists of Defendant's Counsels' choice to visit the Shelby County jail quarters."

Motion to Produce "and turn over to attorneys of record for the defendant such date books, log books, or notebooks or any such personal data belonging to Judge Preston Battle."

Motion to Produce "the name of such person or persons who constructed and designed or advised in the construction or design of the quarters in the Shelby County jail."

Motion to Produce "all and such records that pertain to visits inclusive of the dates and times of his former attorney Percy Foreman and the defendant's brother Jerry Ray."

Motion to Produce "the FBI spectrographic analyses of 1) the bullet fragments taken from the body…and 2) the bullets which were found outside 424 S. Main and which allegedly had been purchased by Petitioner."

Motion to require the state of Tennessee to answer his petition.

Motion to Produce "1) the window sill taken from the bathroom from which an assassin allegedly fired... and 2) the rifle which was allegedly used to assassinate Dr. King and any clip attached to it."

Motion to Order Production of Radio Logs "related to the alleged chase of a white Mustang after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King on April 5, 1968."

Motion to Order Production of Reports By Fire and Police Department Witnesses.

Motion to Subpoena all Registration Records of the Rebel Motel for the Period April 1 through April 5, 1968.

Motion to Produce in Court Hammer and Pliers Referred to in Stipulated Evidence.

Motion to Produce Spectrographic Analyses.

Motion to Order Production of All Police Photos of the Murder Scene and Make Some Available to Petitioner.

Motion to Have Bullets Test Fired From Alleged Murder Weapon." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 22

Motions to Strike and Replication To Motions,1970-1971

Motion to Strike Motion to Test Fire Murder Weapon.

Motion to Strike Motion for Radio Logs.

Motion to Strike Motion for Spectrographis [sic] Analysis.

Motion to Strike Motion for Photographs of the Murder Scene.

Motion to Strike Motion for Reports of Fire and Police Department Witnesses.

Replication to Motion to Subpoena Record of Rebel Motel.

Replication to Motion to Produce Hammer and Pliers.

Replication to Motion to Produce Windowsill and Rifle.

Motion to Strike Motions to Strike.

Motion to Strike Motion to Produce and Ancillary Motions.

Motion to Strike "Petition for Post-Conviction Relief."

Answer and Motion to Strike. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 23

Thank you note, 2 March 1971

"Mere words cannot thank you enough for your decision to deny James Earl Ray a new trial. He's had his trial and he certainly was given a fair one, though a few of the masses may not think so."

Folder 24

Memorandum of Findings of Fact and Law, April 1971

"It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Motion to Strike the Petition, as amended and Supplemental Petition for Post Conviction Relief is sustained and Petition for Post Conviction Relief as amended, and Supplemental Petition is hereby ordered dismissed."

Includes Order Denying Petition (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. H.C. 661)

Folder 25

Handwritten Memorandum Opinion of Law and Facts, 1971

Folder 26

Opinion, 24 February 1972

"The judgment of the trial court is affirmed." (Court of Criminal Appeal of Tennessee, No. 40)

Folder 27

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, 4 December 1972

"Exculpatory evidence was withheld from petitioner…Cruel and unusual punishment was inflicted upon petitioner during his incarceration prior to trial…Irreconcilable conflicts of interest on the part of the petitioner's attorneys engendered enormous prejudicial publicity caused his attorneys to pressure him not to take the witness stand in his own defense and instead enter a plea of guilty against his will." (United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, No. 6800)

Folder 28

James Earl Ray, Appellant v. State of Tennessee, Appellee, 1972

"Appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief from his guilty-plea conviction of first degree murder and punishment of ninety-nine years, which petition was dismissed without evidentiary hearing." (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee)

Folder 29

Memorandum Decision, 27 February 1975

"Pursuant to a remand by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit this court conducted an evidentiary hearing in this habeas corpus case. The hearing lasted eight days, during which 165 exhibits were offered." (United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee)

Folder 30

Affidavit for Lowell W. Bradford, forensic scientist, 17 September 1975

Also included are a Supplemental Affidavit of Newton P. Allen, counsel for CBS. Inc., Allen's Certificate of Service, and Lowell W. Bradford's curriculum vitae. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645)

Folder 31

Affidavit for CBS, Inc., counsel Newton P. Allen, 26 September 1975

Also included is a copy of a court order for retesting of exhibits in the State of California v. Sirhan Bishara Sirhan. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645)

Folder 32

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Petition of CBS Inc., for Inspection by Scientific Examination of the Ballistics Exhibits, 1975

Petitioner, CBS Inc., seeks an order authorizing inspection and scientific examination by CBS News…of the 'ballistics' or firearms identification evidence introduced as exhibits in the trial upon guilty plea of James Earl Ray on March 10, 1969." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 16645)

Folder 33

James Earl Ray, Petitioner-Appellant v. J.H. Rose, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, 10 May 1976

"It is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed." (United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit)

"It is ordered by this Court that the said petition be, and the same is hereby, denied. " (United States Supreme Court)

Folder 34

Memorandum Opinion of Law and Facts and Order, May 1979

"Petitioner's Ground III is denied because the minutes of this Court does show that the Jury correctly specified the degree of homicide for Ray's conviction to be Murder in the First Degree." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. P-1973)

Folder 35

Correspondence, May-June 1979

Correspondence pertains to Ray's petition. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. P-1973)

Folder 36

Petition for Post Conviction Relief, 1979

Also included are a Motion to Amend Petition for Post Conviction Relief and Memorandum Opinion of Law and Facts (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. P-1973)

Folder 37

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, 18 June 1979

"This is yet another of the numerous petitions for post-conviction relief filed by James Earl Ray in both state and federal court…Adjudication by Federal Courts being courts of competent jurisdiction, preclude a post conviction review of the same issue in the Tennessee Courts." Also included are handwritten notes. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. P-3623)

Folder 38

State of Tennessee, Appellee v. James Earl Ray, Appellant, 19 June 1980

"The current petition is but one of many filed by Ray in both state and federal court." (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Jackson, No. 36)

Folder 39

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 7 July 1980

"In the instant indictment nothing in the examination by the court of defendant as reflected in the Voir Dire evidences the court explained the element of 'intent' to the petitioner." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. HC-2285)

Folder 40

Motion of the State of Tennessee to Dismiss Petition, 10 September 1980

Also included is a Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (Criminal Court of Tennessee Fifteenth Judicial Circuit at Memphis, Tenn., No. 2285)

Folder 41

Petition for Post Conviction Relief and Motions, 11 May 1984

"Evidence in the form of suppressed Memorandum by the chief prosecutor in the MLK case, Phil M. Canale, that was unavailable to the petitioner in prior post conviction relief petitions." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn. No. P-3623)

Folder 42

State of Tennessee, Appellee v. James Earl Ray, Appellant, 1986

"In his present brief, the appellant contends that he is entitled to relief because of allegedly newly discovered evidence, which he refers to as the 'Canale Memorandums.'" (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, No. 41)

Folder 43

Order and exhibit report, 31 July 1986

"It appears to the Court that certain physical evidence relevant to the prosecution of James Earl Ray for the murder of Martin Luther King, Jr. is in the possession of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and is scheduled to be destroyed if arrangements for its disposition are not made by the State of Tennessee before August 19, 1986." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn.)

Folder 44

Petition for Post Conviction Relief, 28 September 1987

Also included are a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and an opinion from the State Supreme Court of Tennessee concerning the validity of a guilty plea when the trial judge does not "advise a defendant, in open court, of the constitutional right against self-incrimination." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn. No. P-4977)

Folder 45

Handwritten notes, circa 1988

Folder 46

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, 6 January 1988

"The sole ground stated is that Ray was not advised of his constitutional right that he could not be compelled to incriminate himself." (Criminal Court of Tennessee for the Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis, Tenn., No. P-4977)

Folder 47

Court proceedings about ownership of the Remington rifle, 1988

Renfro Hays, Plaintiff v. John G. Montague, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff v. Hugh W. Stanton, Jr., and James A. Blackwell, Third Party Defendants. (Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tenn. No., 96259-3 R.D.)

Folder 48

Court proceedings about ownership of the Remington rifle, 1989-1990

Renfro Hays, Plaintiff v. John G. Montague, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff v. Hugh W. Stanton, Jr., and James A. Blackwell, Third Party Defendants. (Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 96259-3 R.D.)

Folder 49

Order Overruling Petition to Rehear, 20 March 1989

Also included is a Parole Eligibility Report Addendum. (Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 101)

Folder 50

James Earl Ray v. William H. Williams and J.A. Blackwell, 1990

Includes a letter to the Tennessee State Attorney General requesting representation in two lawsuits, including James Earl Ray v. William H. Williams and J.A. Blackwell (United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, No. 83-2793)

Folder 51

Court proceedings about ownership of the Remington rifle, 1991

"That the return of the weapon to Ray or any of his relatives or friends is specifically prohibited." (Chancery Court of Tennessee, No. 96258-3 R.D.)

Folder 52

James E. Ray, Appellant v. State of Tennessee, 16 March 1992

The appellant has appealed to this Court challenging the lower court's denial of post-conviction relief."(Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 02C01-0106-CR-00122)

Folder 53

Handwritten notes undated

Folder 54

Excerpts marked as exhibits, undated

Copy of pages from The Strange Case of James Earl Ray: The Man Who Murdered Martin Luther King(1969) and a copy of court proceedings that are not identified on the document.

Back to Top

expand/collapse Expand/collapse Series 2. George Howard Putt, 1969-1979.

Approximately 20 items.

Arrangement: chronological.

Folder 55

Affidavits, 1969

For Robert G. Gilder and Gary London Pagels, attorneys for defendant: "Affiants believe that it is a necessity and in the best interest of the defendant that he be removed to the John Gaston Hospital."

For George Howard Putt: "I have been advised by my attorneys that I am in need of professional psychiatric evaluation."

For Donald Shaffer, M.D.: "It is also my professional opinion that there are adequate facilities available at the Prisoner's Ward at the John Gaston Hospital. It is my understanding there are single, padded cells, designed to accommodate such prisoners as Mr. Putt."

Folder 56

Petition for Mental Examination and Transfer to Central Hospital, 1969

(Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 57

Motion for Change of Venue, 20 November 1969-1970

(Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 58

Order Forbidding Interviews for Publicity and from Making Extra-Judicial Statements, 1969-1970

Also included is a 1969 telegram from the American Civil Liberty Union West Tennessee Chapter requesting "that a pre trial order on publicity immediately [be] issued to assure this accused of guaranteed state and federal and constitutional rights." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 59

Motion to Produce, Inspect and Copy Evidence, 8 January 1970

(Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 60

Motion to Designate Court Reporters, 1 April 1970

(Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 61

"George Howard Putt-Sanity Hearing, 19 April 1970

Handwritten notes include phrases "In contact with reality," "Can assist in defense," and "Able to stand trial."

Folder 62

Motion for the Court to Rule, 13 October 1970

"Prior to impaneling of a jury, that the present legal test for sanity in the state of Tennessee is illegal and unconstitutional and to declare and set out a new realistic, valid, and modern test to be followed in determining whether or not George Howard Putt is now or was, at the time of the alleged crimes, legally sane." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 63

Motion to Set Aside Order, 13 October 1970

"Denying Transfer of Putt to Psychiatric Ward of John Gaston Hospital." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 64

State of Tennessee v. George Howard Putt, 1970

Handwritten notes of court proceedings beginning with "State's Proof" on 20 October 1970. (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 23227)

Folder 65

Motion for a New Trial, 23 November 1970

"The verdict is so excessive as to indicate passion and caprice on the part of the jury, and should therefore be set aside." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., No. 23227)

Folder 66

Petition for Mental Examination and Transfer to Central State Hospital, 25 March 1971

"It is the opinion of the attorneys for the defendant that psychiatric examination is needed; further it was the testimony of competent witnesses at the defendant's first trial that he was mentally unbalanced." Also included are a Replication to Petition for Mental Examination and an affidavit for George Howard Putt. "I am having headaches, and feeling extremely depressed. I also appear to be having hallucinations and bad dreams and feel that I need to go to either John Gaston Hospital or Central State Hospital for psychiatric evaluation." (Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tenn., Indictment Nos. 23224 through 23230)

Folder 67

Opinion, 1971-1972

"It is totally unnecessary to detail the vast and overwhelming evidence of Putt's guilt of this slaying. He was virtually caught in the act, confessed and is linked to crime by a totally convincing body of direct evidence. The defendant's proof consisted of three witnesses who sought to prove that he was legally insane." (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, No. 22)

Folder 68

Opinion, 9 January 1974

"The evidence in this case clearly preponderates against the defendant's innocence and the presumption of guilt under which he labors here has not been overcome." (Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, No. 14)

Folder 69

Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, 29 August 1979

Complaints included denial of due process and ineffective counsel. "Petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorneys failed to challenge the unconstitutional composition of the jury panel prior to entering a plea to the indictment. The jury panel assembled for Petitioner's first trial denied him his constitutional right to a jury selected from a representative cross section of the community. Only three of the potential jurors called for voir dire were women. This gross under-representation of women on the jury panel violated the requirement that the panel present a representative cross-section of the community." (Criminal Court for Shelby County, Tenn. P-2118)

Folder 70

Brief in Support of Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, 29 August 1979

"Petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his retained counsel unilaterally determined not to petition the Tennessee Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review his conviction." (Criminal Court for Shelby County, Tenn., P-2118)

Folder 71

Motion of the State of Tennessee, 5 December 1979

"For Inclusion of Prior Technical Records and Bills of Exceptions in the Instant Record and For Leave of Court for Additional Time For Response." (Criminal Court of Tennessee Fifteenth Judicial Circuit at Memphis, Tenn., P-2118)

Back to Top